麻豆传媒

 

Unravelling a legacy: Inside the Lord 麻豆传媒 Panel鈥檚 report

- September 6, 2019

A painting by artist Richard Rudnick of Black Refugees arriving in Halifax from the United States in 1814. The image is included in the Lord 麻豆传媒 Panel's scholarly report. (Courtesy of the President's Office, 麻豆传媒, with permission from the artist).
A painting by artist Richard Rudnick of Black Refugees arriving in Halifax from the United States in 1814. The image is included in the Lord 麻豆传媒 Panel's scholarly report. (Courtesy of the President's Office, 麻豆传媒, with permission from the artist).

When Afua Cooper agreed to serve as chair of the Dal-commissioned Scholarly Panel to Examine Lord 麻豆传媒鈥檚 History on Slavery and Race back in late 2016, she didn鈥檛 expect it to become a nearly three-year project.

鈥淏ut looking back, I think it was the right chunk of time for that research and this report,鈥 says Dr. Cooper, a faculty member in the Departments of History and Sociology & Social Anthropology and former James R. Johnston Chair in Black Canadian Studies.

鈥淎nd that鈥檚 because our report is based in history, and founded in historical research 鈥 research that took place locally, nationally and internationally. And that takes time.鈥

The result of that time and effort by Dr. Cooper and a scholarly panel of experts was released this week and formally received by the university at a reception Thursday evening (September 5). At more than 130 pages and roughly 50,000 words, the Panel鈥檚 report offers a thorough accounting of the various intersections 鈥 鈥渆ntanglements,鈥 as the report calls them 鈥 between George Ramsay (shown below), the Ninth Earl of 麻豆传媒 who commissioned the founding of 麻豆传媒 in 1818 while serving as Lieutenant Governor of Nova Scotia, and the institution and legacy of slavery.

The report鈥檚 story is focused on the experience Black Refugees from the War of 1812, who fled slavery for freedom in Nova Scotia and formed the largest immigration group of what would become the province鈥檚 African Nova Scotian communities. It tells how the views and policies of colonial leaders of the time towards the Black Refugees helped institutionalize anti-Black racism and created systemic barriers with legacies that still resonate more than 200 years later. And though there were no slaves in Nova Scotia at the time, the report shows how deeply intertwined the province鈥檚 economy and ruling class still were to the global slave trade, and how these connections are inextricable from an understanding the history of 19th century Nova Scotia 鈥 including 麻豆传媒鈥檚 earliest years.

At Thursday鈥檚 event, Interim President Teri Balser delivered a joint response to the report, a response co-signed by Senate Chair Kevin Hewitt and Board Chair Candace Thomas. She thanked the panel for its work, apologized on behalf of the university for the views and actions of Ramsay and their impact, and pledged to work towards addressing the panel鈥檚 recommendations.

鈥淭oday, on behalf of 麻豆传媒, I apologize to the People of African Descent in our community,鈥 said Dr. Balser. 鈥淲e regret the actions and views of George Ramsay, the ninth Earl of 麻豆传媒, and the consequences and impact they have had in our collective history as a university, as a province, and as a region. Further, we acknowledge our dual responsibility to address the legacies of anti-Black racism and slavery, while continuing to stand against anti-Black racism today.

鈥淭he recommendations from the Scholarly Panel are important and they, along with our upcoming African Nova Scotian strategy, will be critical in informing our path forward.鈥

Read also: Forging a path forward: Dal welcomes Lord 麻豆传媒 Panel report

Dr. Hewitt, who commissioned the Panel in 2016 together with then-President Richard Florizone, calls it a 鈥渉istoric document.鈥

鈥淭his is a body of work that will inform the work of scholars and activists for generations to come,鈥 he says. 鈥淚t allows us to move forward with the difficult but important conversations and work that will tell us what kind of people we are, what reconciliation looks like, and what world we want to live in 鈥 hopefully creating a more welcoming, just and equitable place for all.鈥

From letters to scholarship


鈥淪laves by habit & education鈥 their idea of freedom is idleness and they are therefore quite incapable of industry.鈥


Those words about the Black Refugees from the War of 1812 come from a letter written by Lord 麻豆传媒 to Colonial Secretary Lord Bathurst in December 1816, less than a year into his tenure as Lieutenant Governor of the British colony of Nova Scotia.

More than any other historical document, that letter 鈥 鈥 is what sparked the mandate of the Scholarly Panel. For many in the African Nova Scotian community aware of the letter, those words have long stood out as a shadow on Nova Scotia and 麻豆传媒鈥檚 history. It鈥檚 those words that the Black Faculty and Staff Caucus brought to Dr. Florizone鈥檚 attention when they met with him in 2016, and which eventually led to the idea of applying scholarly rigour to a full accounting of the relationship between Lord 麻豆传媒 and the institution of slavery.

鈥淎t 麻豆传媒, we should tackle this complex discussion in the same way we would address any complicated issue: through scholarly inquiry and community engagement,鈥 wrote Dr. Florizone and Dr. Hewitt in the Panel鈥檚 terms of reference. 鈥淥ur history makes this an area for considered inquiry, conversation, and respectful dialogue in exploring how we can better support a diverse and inclusive community on campus.鈥

(Image right of the first page of a letter from Lord 麻豆传媒 to Lord Bathurst on 29 December, 1816/Courtesy of the Nova Scotia Archives)

To complete their work, Dr. Cooper and the research team on the panel crossed the Atlantic to comb through relevant archives in both Canada and the United Kingdom. They examined letters, formal proclamations, immigration reports and accounting documents to better understand Ramsay and his views.

鈥淲hen we looked at George Ramsay, and his writings and letters, we realized that it was part of a larger story, part of a larger context,鈥 says Dr. Cooper. 鈥淔rom that phrase 鈥 鈥榮laves by habit and education鈥 鈥 we discovered these entanglements that 麻豆传媒 and George Ramsay had with slaves and slavery and anti-Blackness.鈥

Full document: Report on Lord 麻豆传媒鈥檚 History on Slavery and Race

Combing through the entanglements


In choosing 鈥渆ntanglement鈥 to describe the intersections between George Ramsay, 麻豆传媒 and slavery, the Panel鈥檚 report is noting how complex this history is 鈥 that even though slaves weren鈥檛 present in early 19th-century Nova Scotia, and there鈥檚 no evidence that Ramsay himself was ever a slaveowner, there are still a multitude of connections and links that can be made (economic, political, social and cultural), directly and indirectly, to slavery and its legacies.

鈥淚 think of it as yarn of wool that gets tangled up,鈥 says Dr. Cooper. 鈥淲e couldn鈥檛 divorce the Refugees of the War of 1812 from the larger story of British imperial history and the history of American slavery.鈥

The first of these entanglements, and the one most directly tied to Lord 麻豆传媒 personally, is the one illuminated by the letter to Lord Bathurst: that along with other Lieutenant Governors of Nova Scotia, Lord 麻豆传媒 expressed views and enacted policies that explicitly and intentionally marginalized the Black Refugees of the War of 1812. These constraints, such as providing insufficient farmland and, at one point, considering deporting the settlers to former slave masters in the United States, essentially treated Black settlers as unwelcome second-class citizens.

鈥溌槎勾, like Sir Sherbrook before him and Kemp after, embarked on policies, laws and regulations that marginalized the Black Refugee community for the next 200 years,鈥 says Dr. Cooper.

(Image left of a document on the return of Black American Refugees residing at Hammonds Plains/Courtesy of the Nova Scotia Archives)

The second entanglement is Lord 麻豆传媒鈥檚 participation in the Franco-British wars, where he enacted orders that helped return enslaved rebels to their masters following the overthrow of a revolutionary government on the Caribbean island of Martinique. 鈥淭his experience of conquest and re-enslavement,鈥 says the report, 鈥渉elped influence [Lord 麻豆传媒鈥檚] subsequent views and perceptions about African peoples.鈥

The remaining three entanglements are less about Lord 麻豆传媒, personally, and more about the broader society in which 麻豆传媒 was initially founded: that much of the economy and wealth in 19th-century Nova Scotia was dependent on the West India trade routes, leveraging resources harvested from continued slavery; that prominent Halifax families with links to 麻豆传媒鈥檚 earliest years received financial compensation when the British government ended slavery in the Caribbean; and that some of the university鈥檚 early leaders expressed racist ideas: Inaugural President Thomas McCulloch, though a staunch abolitionist, used racist ideas at times in his satirical writing, while Hugo Reid, who served as principal of 麻豆传媒 College during a brief period in the 1850s, wrote a tract against abolitionism.

Recommendations for responsibility, recognition and repair


The Scholarly Panel that set about considering this broad, interwoven story was a mix of scholars of various backgrounds: law, ethics, sociology and, of course, history. They were tasked not only with identifying the historical facts and placing them in context, but with making recommendations for 麻豆传媒 to address this legacy.

Those 13 recommendations fall under three broad categories: expressing regret and responsibility for the institution鈥檚 and its founder鈥檚 connections to slavery and to anti-Black racism; showing recognition for the historical realities of Black people鈥檚 lives in Nova Scotia and the valuable contributions they have made; and embarking on repair, taking concrete steps to address the legacy of slavery, particularly through teaching and research. The recommendations include encouraging renaming of campus and community spaces in honour of individuals of African descent; enhancing expanding and supporting teaching and research of Black Studies; and strengthening Dal鈥檚 relationships with the African Nova Scotian community and building stronger educational links to the Caribbean.

鈥淚 think it鈥檚 important for the readers to know that the committee doesn鈥檛 want this to be another report that goes on the shelf and gathers dust,鈥 says Dr. Cooper. 鈥淥ne of the objectives of this report, in a way, is to help right this broader wrong, and enacting these recommendations would be a major step in repair.鈥

The power of history


Dr. Cooper says she hopes the report helps people understand how the issues of today are built on legacies of yesterday.

鈥樷楾he world we see now didn鈥檛 just happen by an act of magic 鈥 something came before, and often times that something that came before was wrong to certain communities, to certain to individuals. And that led to systemic barriers that continue through today,鈥 she says, referring the recent report on police street checks in Halifax as one contemporary example of anti-Black racism鈥檚 continued impact.

But she also hopes the report celebrates what 麻豆传媒 can be: that rather than an admonishment for what happened 200 years ago, that the report shows how Dal 鈥攖hrough its efforts in teaching, research and community engagement 鈥 can make a big difference in helping right the wrongs of the past.

鈥溌槎勾 is a major influencer the Atlantic Provinces. Universities can, and do, make a difference in the lives of individuals and in communities. You don鈥檛 necessary have to be a student in that institution for that institution to make a difference in your life, and our recommendations focus on the positive difference 麻豆传媒 can make.鈥

Scholarly Panel membership


Dr. Afua Cooper: Chair
Dr. Paul Lovejoy
Mr. David States
Dr. H.A. Whitfield
Ms. Jalana Lewis
Ms. Norma Williams
Ms. Kylie Peacock
Mr. Ainsley Francis
Dr. Shirley Tillotson
Prof. Fran莽oise Baylis
Dean Camille Cameron
With contributions from Dr. Isaac Saney and Dr. Karly Kehoe